Here is the problem...
Apparently for me, the grass is
always greener on the other side.
When I first arrived in England, the whole group of study abroad students and I went to an orientation at the University of London, where we were told there is a psychological adjustment- a culture shock wave, if you will- to the whole experience.
8am Orientation |
- Honeymoon Stage
- Everything is exciting, new, and predominantly positive - Culture Shock/Conflict
- Unsure of customs
- Overwhelmed, anxious, confused, irritable, hostile - Recovery and Understanding
- Flexible, open to new experiences
– Better understanding of host environment
– Developing social network - Adjustment
- Able to maintain home cultural practices/beliefs and accept or incorporate new cultural practices/beliefs
And then you experience all those same things once you come home again...
Here is MY problem though...
When I got to London I pretty much stayed in honeymoon phase the whole time, while skipping conflict/culture shock, and moving right along to understanding/recovery [not so much the recovery though] and adjustment!!
And now that I am home, I am pretty much stuck on Conflict/Culture Shock. . .
As my flatmate Jenn said "every time you mention it another pang of sadness and yearning hits my heart."
this is my jenny-bean. |
The Cons of London [if you could even call them that...]:
For the first month in London, I could barely sleep during the night. Not because I wasn't comfortable or because I wasn't use to the time change... The girls (my flatmates) theorized that it was because Andrew was around 5000 miles away from me and my body could tell the difference. I thought this plausible, but another factor was that: I am pretty sure if I still had an umbilical cord it would connect straight into the Pacific Ocean. So, while I must admit that I hardly ever missed home while I was in London- I did miss factors of it: like Andrew, my family, the ocean, my friends...
The Cons of Home:
It's not London.
This is like the episode in F.R.I.E.N.D.S where Ross is deciding between dating Julie or Rachel. Rachel has a whole list of cons, but Julie has one: "she's not Rachum"- where Chandler spelled Rachel's name wrong... Granted this leads to a whole fight between Ross and Rachel, but the remaining fact is that Ross broke up with Julie because in the end- whether Rachel would have him or not- Rachel was the best for him...
So what does that make London? Rachel? Does that mean London is where I should be? And if so... Would I miss home more-so the second time around?
Life in San Diego |
Life in London |
Here is the ULTIMATE problem: God has created waaaay too much beauty in this world for my heart to be content in one place... Therefore, no matter where I live, move, travel, ect... I will always craving more and more of His creation.
Thanks a lot Dad...... ;D
1 Comment:
I'm with you on that. I was pretty much on the honey moon phase the whole time. I wasn't homesick or shocked. I mean, I've spent months in the American South, months in China...of all places.
London was so awesome and I think about it every day. I've been organizing some London postcards and I get a little teary eyed. If I let myself go, just a little bit more, I would of cried. hahaha
Post a Comment